Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: imx: fix mixed module-builtin object

2023-06-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 1:52 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Yamada-san, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:07:46AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > With CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QM_LDB=m and CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QXP_LDB=y (or vice > > versa), imx-ldb-helper.o is linked to a module and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: imx: fix mixed module-builtin object

2023-06-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Yamada-san, Thank you for the patch. On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:07:46AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > With CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QM_LDB=m and CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QXP_LDB=y (or vice > versa), imx-ldb-helper.o is linked to a module and also to vmlinux > even though the expected CFLAGS are different betwee

[PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: imx: fix mixed module-builtin object

2023-06-03 Thread Masahiro Yamada
With CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QM_LDB=m and CONFIG_DRM_IMX8QXP_LDB=y (or vice versa), imx-ldb-helper.o is linked to a module and also to vmlinux even though the expected CFLAGS are different between builtins and modules. This is the same situation as fixed by commit 637a642f5ca5 ("zstd: Fixing mixed module-b