Hi,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:09:44AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> I read through the patch and it looks correct to me. The naming is a bit
> off at times. For example, ast_state should now probably be called
> ast_crtc_state. But that's not a blocker IMHO.
Yeah, a few places have odd names
Hi
Am 28.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as
> an argument or the full atomic state.
>
> The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the
> latter for new hooks or when it was needed.
>
> Let's
Hi!
Thanks for reviewing those patches
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:50:41PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as
> > an argument or the full atomic state.
> >
> > T
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as
> an argument or the full atomic state.
>
> The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the
> latter for new hooks or when it was nee
The current atomic helpers have either their object state being passed as
an argument or the full atomic state.
The former is the pattern that was done at first, before switching to the
latter for new hooks or when it was needed.
Let's start convert all the remaining helpers to provide a consiste
