On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 22:30 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > Two consecutive writes to the same bus address are perfectly legal
> > from
> > the PCIe specification and can happen all the time, even without this
> > specific hw workaround.
>
> Yes I know it, and I am not from Loongson, just some us
Am 17.06.24 um 18:09 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
BTW is there any operation that could be taken to examine this specific
workaround?
Is there any case possible to reproduce?
No idea, I mean that's for GFX7/8 which was released between 2013 and 2017.
My educated guess is that you could create a tes
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:59 +0200,Christian König写道:
> Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > > > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > > > Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy
Am 17.06.24 um 17:35 schrieb Xi Ruoyao:
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 22:30 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
Two consecutive writes to the same bus address are perfectly legal
from
the PCIe specification and can happen all the time, even without this
specific hw workaround.
Yes I know it, and I am not from
Am 17.06.24 um 16:57 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 16:42 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 16:30 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:59 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
...
In this cas
在 2024-06-17星期一的 16:42 +0200,Christian König写道:
> Am 17.06.24 um 16:30 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:59 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > > > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > > > Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy
Am 17.06.24 um 16:30 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:59 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 1
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:59 +0200,Christian König写道:
> Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > > > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > > > Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy
Am 17.06.24 um 15:43 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one
ha
在 2024-06-17星期一的 15:09 +0200,Christian König写道:
> Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > 在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
> > > Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > > > The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one
> > > > have
> > > > seq-1 writt
Am 17.06.24 um 15:03 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one have
seq-1 written and the latter one have seq written, seems to confuse
some
hardware platform
在 2024-06-17星期一的 14:35 +0200,Christian König写道:
> Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
> > The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one have
> > seq-1 written and the latter one have seq written, seems to confuse
> > some
> > hardware platform (e.g. Loongson 7A series PCIe
Am 17.06.24 um 12:58 schrieb Icenowy Zheng:
The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one have
seq-1 written and the latter one have seq written, seems to confuse some
hardware platform (e.g. Loongson 7A series PCIe controllers).
Make the content of the duplicated EOP packet the
The duplication of EOP packets for GFX7/8, with the former one have
seq-1 written and the latter one have seq written, seems to confuse some
hardware platform (e.g. Loongson 7A series PCIe controllers).
Make the content of the duplicated EOP packet the same with the real
one, only masking any poss
14 matches
Mail list logo