Hi Al
Any comment on this?
Regards
David
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:45 AM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
> the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
> mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is
Hi Al
Any comment on this?
Regards
David
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:45 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
> the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
> mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:45:29AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
> the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
> mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is no easy way to get a
> shared addres
DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is no easy way to get a
shared address_space for DRM devices during initialization. Therefore, we
currently d
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:45:29AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
> the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
> mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is no easy way to get a
> shared addres
DRM core shares a single address_space across all inodes that belong to
the same DRM device. This allows efficient unmapping of user-space
mappings during buffer destruction. However, there is no easy way to get a
shared address_space for DRM devices during initialization. Therefore, we
currently d
