Am 02.07.20 um 10:26 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
On 25/06/2020 15:43, Christian König wrote:
Am 25.06.20 um 14:34 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
This reverts commit 5de376bb434f80a13138f0ebedc8351ab73d8b0d.
This change breaks synchronization of a timeline.
dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() might be a bi
On 25/06/2020 15:43, Christian König wrote:
Am 25.06.20 um 14:34 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
This reverts commit 5de376bb434f80a13138f0ebedc8351ab73d8b0d.
This change breaks synchronization of a timeline.
dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() might be a bit of a confusing name but
this function is not tr
Hi Christian,
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 18:10 Daniel Vetter, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal:
> > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> Ignoring everything else ...
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 25
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal:
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> Ignoring everything else ...
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula
> >> wrote:
> >>> As a side note, there seem to be
Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Ignoring everything else ...
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when
applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Ignoring everything else ...
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> > As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when
> > applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for
> > drm-m
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 05:27, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > WTUF?
> >
> > How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone
> > in core dma-buf,
> >
> > Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to
> > stop Chris m
Ignoring everything else ...
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
> As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when
> applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for
> drm-misc.
One option to generalize that that I pondered is to consult
ge
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie wrote:
> WTUF?
>
> How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone
> in core dma-buf,
>
> Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to
> stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing
> happens, thi
WTUF?
How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone
in core dma-buf,
Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to
stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing
happens, this is totally unacceptable.
Dave.
Signed-off-by: Chr
Am 25.06.20 um 14:34 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
This reverts commit 5de376bb434f80a13138f0ebedc8351ab73d8b0d.
This change breaks synchronization of a timeline.
dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() might be a bit of a confusing name but
this function is not trying to find a particular seqno, is supposed
This reverts commit 5de376bb434f80a13138f0ebedc8351ab73d8b0d.
This change breaks synchronization of a timeline.
dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() might be a bit of a confusing name but
this function is not trying to find a particular seqno, is supposed to
give a fence to wait on for a particular point
12 matches
Mail list logo
