Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the comments.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:46:23AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2012 23:13:45 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the comments.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:46:23AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2012 23:13:45 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi
Hi Sakari,
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 23:13:45 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > > driv
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:58:42AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I think my preference would go for a helper function that drivers can use,
> possibly first waiting until a second driver requires this kind of checks
> before implementing it.
I'd like to see a driver that doesn't. Quite likely
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the comments.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > driver does the same check itself currently, b
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:58:42AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I think my preference would go for a helper function that drivers can use,
> possibly first waiting until a second driver requires this kind of checks
> before implementing it.
I'd like to see a driver that doesn't. Quite likely
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the comments.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > driver does the same check itself currently, b
Hi Sakari,
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 23:13:45 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > > driv
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 10:23:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
> > g
Hi Sakari,
On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
> generic than that.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:17PM +0300, Sa
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 10:23:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> > driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
> > g
Hi Sakari,
On 11/13/2012 03:24 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
> driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
> generic than that.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:17PM +0300, Sa
Hi all,
Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
generic than that.
Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:17PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> If an entity has sink pads, at least one of them must
Hi all,
Comments would be appreciated, either positive or negative. The omap3isp
driver does the same check itself currently, but I think this is more
generic than that.
Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:17PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> If an entity has sink pads, at least one of them must
If an entity has sink pads, at least one of them must be connected to
another pad with an enabled link. If a driver with multiple sink pads has
more strict requirements the check should be done in the driver itself.
Just requiring one sink pad is connected with an enabled link is enough
API-wise:
If an entity has sink pads, at least one of them must be connected to
another pad with an enabled link. If a driver with multiple sink pads has
more strict requirements the check should be done in the driver itself.
Just requiring one sink pad is connected with an enabled link is enough
API-wise:
16 matches
Mail list logo