On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:21:40PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:52:06PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Document what I've learned so far about the gmux so that we can
> > collaboratively reverse-engineer its remaining unknown bits
> > without everyone having to start from
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:21:40 -0800
Darren Hart wrote:
> Any concerns with this series? If not, I'll take it in via the pdx86 tree.
>
Well, it's built around the asciidoc patch, which isn't in the mainline
at this point. Should things go a different direction, that could force
some changes here;
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:06 +0100 Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Document what I've learned so far about the gmux so that we can
> collaboratively reverse-engineer its remaining unknown bits
> without everyone having to start from scratch.
>
> The DOC sections are bound together in the gpu.tmpl DocBook
> u
Document what I've learned so far about the gmux so that we can
collaboratively reverse-engineer its remaining unknown bits
without everyone having to start from scratch.
The DOC sections are bound together in the gpu.tmpl DocBook
under a new vga_switcheroo "Handlers" chapter. Eventually
this shou
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:52:06PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Document what I've learned so far about the gmux so that we can
> collaboratively reverse-engineer its remaining unknown bits
> without everyone having to start from scratch.
>
+Jon Corbet
+Daniel Vetter
+linux-doc
Any concerns with
