On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:43:27AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Originally the irq safe spinlock was required because of asle
> > interrupts. But since
> >
> > commit 7bd688cd66db93f6430f6e2b3145ee5686daa315
> > Author: Jani Nikula
> > Date: Fri Nov
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Originally the irq safe spinlock was required because of asle
> interrupts. But since
>
> commit 7bd688cd66db93f6430f6e2b3145ee5686daa315
> Author: Jani Nikula
> Date: Fri Nov 8 16:48:56 2013 +0200
>
> drm/i915: handle backlight through chip speci
Originally the irq safe spinlock was required because of asle
interrupts. But since
commit 7bd688cd66db93f6430f6e2b3145ee5686daa315
Author: Jani Nikula
Date: Fri Nov 8 16:48:56 2013 +0200
drm/i915: handle backlight through chip specific functions
there's no need for this any more. So swit