Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/tegra: Implement dynamic channel allocation model

2017-11-13 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
On 07.11.2017 15:29, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > On 05.11.2017 19:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> On 05.11.2017 14:01, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >>> In the traditional channel allocation model, a single hardware channel >>> was allocated for each client. This is simple from an implementation >>> perspectiv

Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/tegra: Implement dynamic channel allocation model

2017-11-08 Thread Mikko Perttunen
On 05.11.2017 19:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: On 05.11.2017 14:01, Mikko Perttunen wrote: In the traditional channel allocation model, a single hardware channel was allocated for each client. This is simple from an implementation perspective but prevents use of hardware scheduling. This patch imp

Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/tegra: Implement dynamic channel allocation model

2017-11-06 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
On 05.11.2017 14:01, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > In the traditional channel allocation model, a single hardware channel > was allocated for each client. This is simple from an implementation > perspective but prevents use of hardware scheduling. > > This patch implements a channel allocation model wh

[PATCH 08/10] drm/tegra: Implement dynamic channel allocation model

2017-11-05 Thread Mikko Perttunen
In the traditional channel allocation model, a single hardware channel was allocated for each client. This is simple from an implementation perspective but prevents use of hardware scheduling. This patch implements a channel allocation model where when a user submits a job for a context, a hardwar