[PATCH 07/27] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v3

2012-05-02 Thread Christian König
On 01.05.2012 19:19, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote: > From: Christian K?nig > > Make the suballocator self containing to locking. > > v2: split the bugfix into a seperate patch. > v3: Jerome Glisse use mutex, no reason to use spinlock that > are more heavyweight than mutex NAK, radeon_sa_bo_free

Re: [PATCH 07/27] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v3

2012-05-02 Thread Christian König
On 01.05.2012 19:19, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote: From: Christian König Make the suballocator self containing to locking. v2: split the bugfix into a seperate patch. v3: Jerome Glisse use mutex, no reason to use spinlock that are more heavyweight than mutex NAK, radeon_sa_bo_free is called f

[PATCH 07/27] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v3

2012-05-01 Thread j.gli...@gmail.com
From: Christian K?nig Make the suballocator self containing to locking. v2: split the bugfix into a seperate patch. v3: Jerome Glisse use mutex, no reason to use spinlock that are more heavyweight than mutex Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse --- drivers/gpu/drm/

[PATCH 07/27] drm/radeon: add proper locking to the SA v3

2012-05-01 Thread j . glisse
From: Christian König Make the suballocator self containing to locking. v2: split the bugfix into a seperate patch. v3: Jerome Glisse use mutex, no reason to use spinlock that are more heavyweight than mutex Signed-off-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse --- drivers/gpu/drm/