[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-29 Thread Jon Hunter
On 28/06/16 22:32, Wolfram Sang wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > >> For >> example some Tegra devices have an I2C interface which may share its >> pins with other devices and to share these pins subnodes for >> representing these pins so they have be shared via the pinctrl framework >> a

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-28 Thread Wolfram Sang
> For > example some Tegra devices have an I2C interface which may share its > pins with other devices and to share these pins subnodes for > representing these pins so they have be shared via the pinctrl framework > are needed. I think the above sentence is hard to grasp. Can you split it into mo

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-28 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2016-06-28 10:21, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 27/06/16 13:04, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2016-06-23 17:59, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The I2C driver core for boards using device-tree assumes any subnode of >>> an I2C adapter in the device-tree blob as being a I2C slave device. >>> Although this makes com

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-28 Thread Jon Hunter
On 27/06/16 13:04, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2016-06-23 17:59, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The I2C driver core for boards using device-tree assumes any subnode of >> an I2C adapter in the device-tree blob as being a I2C slave device. >> Although this makes complete sense, some I2C adapters may have subnode

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-27 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2016-06-23 17:59, Jon Hunter wrote: > The I2C driver core for boards using device-tree assumes any subnode of > an I2C adapter in the device-tree blob as being a I2C slave device. > Although this makes complete sense, some I2C adapters may have subnodes > which are not I2C slaves but subnodes pr

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-24 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > The I2C driver core for boards using device-tree assumes any subnode of > an I2C adapter in the device-tree blob as being a I2C slave device. > Although this makes complete sense, some I2C adapters may have subnodes > which are not I2C s

[PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

2016-06-23 Thread Jon Hunter
The I2C driver core for boards using device-tree assumes any subnode of an I2C adapter in the device-tree blob as being a I2C slave device. Although this makes complete sense, some I2C adapters may have subnodes which are not I2C slaves but subnodes presenting other features. For example some Tegra