On 11/08/2011 12:40 AM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> ttm_backend will exist only and only with a ttm_tt, and ttm_tt
> will be of interesting use only when bind to a backend. Thus to
> avoid code& data duplication btw the two merge them.
>
>
Looks mainly good, but I'd
On 11/08/2011 12:40 AM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse
ttm_backend will exist only and only with a ttm_tt, and ttm_tt
will be of interesting use only when bind to a backend. Thus to
avoid code& data duplication btw the two merge them.
Looks mainly good, but I'd still like
From: Jerome Glisse
ttm_backend will exist only and only with a ttm_tt, and ttm_tt
will be of interesting use only when bind to a backend. Thus to
avoid code & data duplication btw the two merge them.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/
From: Jerome Glisse
ttm_backend will exist only and only with a ttm_tt, and ttm_tt
will be of interesting use only when bind to a backend. Thus to
avoid code & data duplication btw the two merge them.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/
