Hi
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> Thanks. Want a Reviewed-By: or Acked-By: added?
Oh, sure:
Reviewed-by: David Herrmann
Thanks
David
On 03/28/2014 12:23 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> The master management was previously protected by the
>> drm_device::struct_mutex.
>> In order to avoid locking order violations in a reworked dropped master
>> security check in
Hi
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> The master management was previously protected by the
> drm_device::struct_mutex.
> In order to avoid locking order violations in a reworked dropped master
> security check in the vmwgfx driver, break it out into a separate
> master
The master management was previously protected by the drm_device::struct_mutex.
In order to avoid locking order violations in a reworked dropped master
security check in the vmwgfx driver, break it out into a separate master_mutex.
Locking order is master_mutex -> struct_mutex.
Also remove drm_mas
