On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> The requirements for connector_list locking are a bit tricky:
> - We need to be able to jump over zombie conectors (i.e. with refcount
> == 0, but not yet removed from the list). If instead we require that
> there's no zombies on the lis
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:22:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > +/**
>> > + * drm_for_each_connector_iter - connector_list iterator macro
>> > + * @connector: struct &drm_connector pointer used as cursor
>>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:22:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * drm_for_each_connector_iter - connector_list iterator macro
> > + * @connector: struct &drm_connector pointer used as cursor
> > + * @iter: struct &drm_connector_list_iter
> >
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The requirements for connector_list locking are a bit tricky:
> - We need to be able to jump over zombie conectors (i.e. with refcount
> == 0, but not yet removed from the list). If instead we require that
> there's no zombies on the list then the fi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The requirements for connector_list locking are a bit tricky:
> - We need to be able to jump over zombie conectors (i.e. with refcount
> == 0, but not yet removed from the list). If instead we require that
> there's no zombies on
The requirements for connector_list locking are a bit tricky:
- We need to be able to jump over zombie conectors (i.e. with refcount
== 0, but not yet removed from the list). If instead we require that
there's no zombies on the list then the final kref_put must happen
under the list protectio
