[PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Christian König
On 07.05.2012 16:39, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian K?nig > wrote: >> From: Jerome Glisse >> >> This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is >> to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to >> care about wrap around. >> >> Te

[PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Christian König
From: Jerome Glisse This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to care about wrap around. Tested with and without writeback using 0xF000 as initial fence sequence and thus allowing to test the wrap around from

[PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Christian K?nig wrote: > On 07.05.2012 16:39, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian K?nig >> ?wrote: >>> >>> From: Jerome Glisse >>> >>> This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is >>> to use the fact that uin64_t

[PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian K?nig wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is > to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to > care about wrap around. > > Tested with and without writeback using 0xF000 as

Re: [PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Christian König wrote: > On 07.05.2012 16:39, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian König >>  wrote: >>> >>> From: Jerome Glisse >>> >>> This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is >>> to use the fact that uin64_t

Re: [PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Christian König
On 07.05.2012 16:39, Jerome Glisse wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian König wrote: From: Jerome Glisse This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to care about wrap around. Tested with and without

Re: [PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Christian König wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse > > This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is > to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to > care about wrap around. > > Tested with and without writeback using 0xF000 as i

[PATCH 04/20] drm/radeon: convert fence to uint64_t v4

2012-05-07 Thread Christian König
From: Jerome Glisse This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to care about wrap around. Tested with and without writeback using 0xF000 as initial fence sequence and thus allowing to test the wrap around from