On 02/06/2021 19:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:06:50PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 21/05/2021 10:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
>>> + if (!xa_empty(&job->deps))
>>> + return xa_erase(&job->deps, job->last_dep++);
>>
>> Rather than tracking last_dep separatel
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:06:50PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 21/05/2021 10:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > More consistency and prep work for the next patch.
> >
> > Aside: I wonder whether we shouldn't just move this entire xarray
> > business into the scheduler so that not everyone has to rei
On 21/05/2021 10:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> More consistency and prep work for the next patch.
>
> Aside: I wonder whether we shouldn't just move this entire xarray
> business into the scheduler so that not everyone has to reinvent the
> same wheels. Cc'ing some scheduler people for this too.
>
>
More consistency and prep work for the next patch.
Aside: I wonder whether we shouldn't just move this entire xarray
business into the scheduler so that not everyone has to reinvent the
same wheels. Cc'ing some scheduler people for this too.
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: Luben Tuikov
Cc: Alex Deuch
