On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 05:50:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday, 7 September 2018 11:56:23 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> The current set of parameters should cover all the potential users.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-o
Hi Maxime,
On Friday, 7 September 2018 11:56:23 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> The current set of parameters should cover all the potential users.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> >> ---
> >>
> >> include/linux/phy/phy
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The current set of parameters should cover all the potential users.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> > ---
> > include/linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h | 241 +++-
> > include/linux/phy/phy.h
Hi Maxime,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 12:16:34 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Now that we have some infrastructure for it, allow the MIPI D-PHY phy's to
> be configured through the generic functions through a custom structure
> added to the generic union.
>
> The parame
Now that we have some infrastructure for it, allow the MIPI D-PHY phy's to
be configured through the generic functions through a custom structure
added to the generic union.
The parameters added here are the one defined in the MIPI D-PHY spec, plus
some parameters that were used by a number of PHY
