Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:16:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:13:17PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:12:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > O

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:13:17PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:12:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > > > > On 202

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

Hi Stefan, On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:34:07PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2020-06-02 15:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > >>> On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

Hi Daniel, On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:12:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > > > On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Replace the manual connector im

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On 2020-06-02 15:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: >> > On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > > Replace the manual connector implementation based

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:14:21AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > > On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the > > > drm_panel_bridge hel

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

Hi Stefan, On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the > > drm_panel_bridge helper. This simplifies the mxsfb driver by removing > > connector-related code,

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On 2020-03-23 22:38, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Stefan. > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: >> On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the >> > drm_panel_bridge helper. This simplifies the mxs

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

Hi Stefan. On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:27:21PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the > > drm_panel_bridge helper. This simplifies the mxsfb driver by removing > > connector-related code,

Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

On 2020-03-09 20:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the > drm_panel_bridge helper. This simplifies the mxsfb driver by removing > connector-related code, and standardizing all pipeline control > operations on bridges. > > A hack is nee

[PATCH 02/21] drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge

Replace the manual connector implementation based on drm_panel with the drm_panel_bridge helper. This simplifies the mxsfb driver by removing connector-related code, and standardizing all pipeline control operations on bridges. A hack is needed to get hold of the connector, as that's our only sour