Hi Daniel,
On 02/04/2015 11:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:42:57PM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/04/2015 04:14 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> From: Gustavo Padovan
>>>
>>> exynos_plane_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) calls the win_enable()'s callback
>>> from th
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:05:43AM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 02/04/2015 11:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:42:57PM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 02/04/2015 04:14 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> >>> From: Gustavo Padovan
> >>>
> >
Hi,
On 02/04/2015 04:14 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> exynos_plane_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) calls the win_enable()'s callback
> from the underlying layer. However neither one of these layers implement
> win_enable() - FIMD, Mixer and VIDI. Thus the call to exynos_plane_dpm
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:42:57PM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/04/2015 04:14 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > exynos_plane_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) calls the win_enable()'s callback
> > from the underlying layer. However neither one of these layers impl
From: Gustavo Padovan
exynos_plane_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) calls the win_enable()'s callback
from the underlying layer. However neither one of these layers implement
win_enable() - FIMD, Mixer and VIDI. Thus the call to exynos_plane_dpms()
is pointless.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan
---
driver