On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:48:08AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > And to avoid surprising userspace, make sure we don't copy more
> > connectors than planned, and report the actual number of connectors
> > copied. That way any racing
Looping when we keep track of this is silly. Only thing we have to
be careful is with sampling the connector count. To avoid inconsisten
results due to gcc re-computing this, use READ_ONCE.
And to avoid surprising userspace, make sure we don't copy more
connectors than planned, and report the actu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> And to avoid surprising userspace, make sure we don't copy more
> connectors than planned, and report the actual number of connectors
> copied. That way any racing hot-add/remove will be handled.
> @@ -1938,6 +1929,7 @@ int drm_mode_
