On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:41:21AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Divide all the indices by 64 to save memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
>
> Pretty sure this goes boom. Our char device minor allocation scheme is
>
>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:41:21AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Divide all the indices by 64 to save memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
>
> Pretty sure this goes boom. Our char device minor allocation scheme is
>
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:41:21AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Divide all the indices by 64 to save memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
Pretty sure this goes boom. Our char device minor allocation scheme is
device 0: card0=0, renderD0=64
device 1: card1=1, renderD1=65
...
I think your
Divide all the indices by 64 to save memory.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 49 ++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index 12e5e2be7890..17ed29f
