Op 12-11-12 15:00, Maarten Lankhorst schreef:
> The few places that care should have those checks instead.
> This allow destruction of bo backed memory without a reservation.
Forgot to add, this patch series depends on the previous sync_obj_arg removal
patches, and cpu_writers -EBUSY change.
~Maa
The few places that care should have those checks instead.
This allow destruction of bo backed memory without a reservation.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deleti
Op 12-11-12 15:00, Maarten Lankhorst schreef:
> The few places that care should have those checks instead.
> This allow destruction of bo backed memory without a reservation.
Forgot to add, this patch series depends on the previous sync_obj_arg removal
patches, and cpu_writers -EBUSY change.
~Maa
The few places that care should have those checks instead.
This allow destruction of bo backed memory without a reservation.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deleti
