[PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink

From: Qi Zheng Hi all, 1. Background = We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [1], but then kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [2], so we reverted it [3]. This patch series aims to re-implement the lockless slab sh

Re: [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink

Hi all, Well, this one was sent successfully. Since I always get the following error message, I deleted the original cc people and only kept the mailing lists. 4.7.1 Error: too many recipients from 49.7.199.173 Thanks, Qi

Re: [External] [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink

This patch set failed to send due to the following reasons, please ignore. 4.7.1 Error: too many recipients from 49.7.199.65

[PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink

From: Qi Zheng Hi all, 1. Background = We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [1], but then kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [2], so we reverted it [3]. This patch series aims to re-implement the lockless slab sh

[PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink

Hi all, 1. Background = We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [1], but then kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [2], so we reverted it [3]. This patch series aims to re-implement the lockless slab shrink using the re