On 04/28/2016 11:19 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a m
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:45:54PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
> >> with this series might n
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
>>> with this series might not be too
On 28 April 2016 at 07:45, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
>>> with this series might not be too wise. D
On 27 April 2016 at 22:57, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 28 April 2016 at 07:45, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner
On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
>> with this series might not be too wise. David H, can we hear your view
>> on the topic ?
>
> For
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
> with this series might not be too wise. David H, can we hear your view
> on the topic ?
For armada and etnaviv, it seems sensible, so I'd be happy to see the
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> [Re-sending to the correct mailing list. Apologies if you've seen it already]
>
> Hi all, David Howells
>
> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
> with this series might not be too wise. David H,
[Re-sending to the correct mailing list. Apologies if you've seen it already]
Hi all, David Howells
Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen
with this series might not be too wise. David H, can we hear your view
on the topic ?
Note that these headers are meant t
