[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:19:39PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything > > > >> in > > > >> the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > > > >> directly test my branch: > > > >> > > > >> http://cgit.f

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:19:39PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything > > > >> in > > > >> the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > > > >> directly test my branch: > > > >> > > > >> http://cgit.f

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-07 Thread James Simmons
> > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in > > >> the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > > >> directly test my branch: > > >> > > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=kill-with-fire > > > > > > Okay I tried the patches

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-07 Thread James Simmons
> > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in > > >> the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > > >> directly test my branch: > > >> > > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=kill-with-fire > > > > > > Okay I tried the patches

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 17:10, James Simmons > wrote: > >> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you > >> > have a second version of this patch? > >> > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I h

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 17:10, James Simmons wrote: > >> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you > >> > have a second version of this patch? > >> > >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I have

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 17:10, James Simmons wrote: >> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you >> > have a second version of this patch? >> >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in >> the via specific patches, but if it's more con

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 17:10, James Simmons wrote: >> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you >> > have a second version of this patch? >> >> Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in >> the via specific patches, but if it's more con

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-14 Thread James Simmons
> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you > > have a second version of this patch? > > Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in > the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > directly test my branch: > > ht

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-14 Thread James Simmons
> > Should I test this set of patches for the VIA driver or wait until you > > have a second version of this patch? > > Testing this on via would be awesome! Iirc I haven't changed anything in > the via specific patches, but if it's more convenient you can also > directly test my branch: > > ht

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:33:07PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > Review, flames highly welcome. > > > > Cheers, Daniel > > > > Daniel Vetter (23): > > drm/sis: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > > drm/via: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > > drm/sman: kill owner trac

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-11 Thread James Simmons
> Review, flames highly welcome. > > Cheers, Daniel > > Daniel Vetter (23): > drm/sis: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > drm/via: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > drm/sman: kill owner tracking interface functions > drm/sman: rip out owner tracking > drm/via: track

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:33:07PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > Review, flames highly welcome. > > > > Cheers, Daniel > > > > Daniel Vetter (23): > > drm/sis: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > > drm/via: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > > drm/sman: kill owner trac

Re: [PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-11-11 Thread James Simmons
> Review, flames highly welcome. > > Cheers, Daniel > > Daniel Vetter (23): > drm/sis: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > drm/via: track obj->drm_fd relations in the driver > drm/sman: kill owner tracking interface functions > drm/sman: rip out owner tracking > drm/via: track

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-10-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, It's that time of the year again when the weather gets crappy, people depressed and danvet wades through drm cruft. Not that any of this is related in any way. Actually I only wanted to port users of drm_mm to the new interfaces, completing a work I've started a while ago. It lead to a li

[PATCH 00/23] kill drm cruft with fire

2011-10-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, It's that time of the year again when the weather gets crappy, people depressed and danvet wades through drm cruft. Not that any of this is related in any way. Actually I only wanted to port users of drm_mm to the new interfaces, completing a work I've started a while ago. It lead to a li