Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-24 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 1:55 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > I also questioned whether this really made sense to try to do with a > > Coccinelle script and I still don't think so. It looks like Dmitry has > > already reviewed the first few of your patches and has repeated my > > advice. If you

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-19 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 8:35 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:11:33AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:14:43PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:55

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-19 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:11:33AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:14:43PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-19 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:14:43PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:26:02AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-18 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:14:43PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:26:02AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:44 PM Anusha Srivatsa > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-18 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:26:02AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:44 PM Anusha Srivatsa > > wrote: > > > > > > A lot of mipi API are deprecated and have a _multi() variant > > > which is the

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-18 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:26:02AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:44 PM Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > > > A lot of mipi API are deprecated and have a _multi() variant > > which is the preferred way forward. This covers TODO in the > > gpu Documentation:[1] > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-14 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:44 PM Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > A lot of mipi API are deprecated and have a _multi() variant > which is the preferred way forward. This covers TODO in the > gpu Documentation:[1] > > An incomplete effort was made in the previous version > to address this[2]. It re

[PATCH 00/20] drm/panel: Move to using mipi_dsi_*_multi() variants when available

2025-02-13 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
A lot of mipi API are deprecated and have a _multi() variant which is the preferred way forward. This covers TODO in the gpu Documentation:[1] An incomplete effort was made in the previous version to address this[2]. It removed on the mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() and mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(