Re: [PATCH 00/14] drm/mgag200: Move model-specific code into separate functions

On 11/07/2022 09:29, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Sam, thanks for reviewing. Am 08.07.22 um 19:22 schrieb Sam Ravnborg: Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:39:15AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Mgag200 still mixes model-specific code and generic code in the same functions. Separate it int

Re: [PATCH 00/14] drm/mgag200: Move model-specific code into separate functions

Hi Sam, thanks for reviewing. Am 08.07.22 um 19:22 schrieb Sam Ravnborg: Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:39:15AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Mgag200 still mixes model-specific code and generic code in the same functions. Separate it into distinct helpers. As part of this effort, co

Re: [PATCH 00/14] drm/mgag200: Move model-specific code into separate functions

Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:39:15AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Mgag200 still mixes model-specific code and generic code in the same > functions. Separate it into distinct helpers. > > As part of this effort, convert the driver from simple-KMS helpers > to regular atomic helpers.

[PATCH 00/14] drm/mgag200: Move model-specific code into separate functions

Mgag200 still mixes model-specific code and generic code in the same functions. Separate it into distinct helpers. As part of this effort, convert the driver from simple-KMS helpers to regular atomic helpers. The latter are way more flexible and can be adapted easily for each hardware model. Test