[PATCH 00/12] Improve PX support in radeon and amdgpu

2016-06-02 Thread Christian König
Am 01.06.2016 um 22:53 schrieb Alex Deucher: > This patch set cleans up and attempts to make runtime pm more > reliable in radeon and amdgpu on PX systems. If you have a PX > system that requires setting the runpm=0 module parameter for > stability, please try this patch set. > > The main fix is t

[PATCH 00/12] Improve PX support in radeon and amdgpu

2016-06-02 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Mike Lothian wrote: > Are these in a branch somewhere? If not I'll try apply the mbox from > patchwork.freedesktop.org > Just pushed to my drm-next-4.8-wip branch. Alex > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 at 21:53 Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> This patch set cleans up and attempts

[PATCH 00/12] Improve PX support in radeon and amdgpu

2016-06-02 Thread Mike Lothian
Are these in a branch somewhere? If not I'll try apply the mbox from patchwork.freedesktop.org On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 at 21:53 Alex Deucher wrote: > This patch set cleans up and attempts to make runtime pm more > reliable in radeon and amdgpu on PX systems. If you have a PX > system that requires s

[PATCH 00/12] Improve PX support in radeon and amdgpu

2016-06-01 Thread Alex Deucher
This patch set cleans up and attempts to make runtime pm more reliable in radeon and amdgpu on PX systems. If you have a PX system that requires setting the runpm=0 module parameter for stability, please try this patch set. The main fix is that a minimum of 200ms of delay is required between a dG