On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> > __devX stuff whic
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> Author: David S. Miller
> Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
>
> Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
>
> This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > > most of the discard valu
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > > most of the discard valu
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> > __devX stuff whic
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:07 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> > Author: David S. Miller
> > Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
> >
> > Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
> >
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> Author: David S. Miller
> Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
>
> Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
>
> This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:07 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
> > Author: David S. Miller
> > Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
> >
> > Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
> >
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain.
I have long felt that those
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain.
I have long felt that those
See commit:
commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
Author: David S. Miller
Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b4.
It causes new build regressions with gcc-4.2 which
I'm getting screen and screens full of section mismatches from my test
builds of the current kernel to the point where it's sometimes more
meaningful messages get hidden by the bulk of mismatches. This is the
first round of fixes with more to come.
Ralf
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_clocks.c
See commit:
commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
Author: David S. Miller
Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b4.
It causes new build regressions with gcc-4.2 which is
p
I'm getting screen and screens full of section mismatches from my test
builds of the current kernel to the point where it's sometimes more
meaningful messages get hidden by the bulk of mismatches. This is the
first round of fixes with more to come.
Ralf
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_clocks.c
14 matches
Mail list logo