On 07/03/14 15:05, David Herrmann wrote:
> If you can take these two patches, that's fine. They're not strictly
> needed by the series and I'd be happy to see them upstream. The other
> sysfb patches should be merged together, so I don't think there's much
> gain in applying them through fbdev.
O
Hi Tomi
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 07/03/14 15:05, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> If you can take these two patches, that's fine. They're not strictly
>> needed by the series and I'd be happy to see them upstream. The other
>> sysfb patches should be merged together, s
On 06/03/14 14:16, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Tomi
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> On 03/03/14 13:09, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
What do you think, would it be possible to keep the sysfb stuff in
arch/x86, and still be able to do the rest of the stuff here
Hi
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 06/03/14 14:16, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi Tomi
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
>> wrote:
>>> On 03/03/14 13:09, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
> What do you think, would it be possible to keep the sysfb stuff i
Hi Tomi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On 03/03/14 13:09, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>>> What do you think, would it be possible to keep the sysfb stuff in
>>> arch/x86, and still be able to do the rest of the stuff here? And then
>>> move the sysfs from arch/x86 to driver
On 03/03/14 13:09, David Herrmann wrote:
>> What do you think, would it be possible to keep the sysfb stuff in
>> arch/x86, and still be able to do the rest of the stuff here? And then
>> move the sysfs from arch/x86 to drivers/video later?
>
> I don't think there's any need for that. Linus does
On 03/03/14 12:29, David Herrmann wrote:
>> What's the status with this one? Headed for 3.15?
>>
>> Are the SimpleDRM and sysfb linked somehow? (I.e. do they need to be in
>> the same series?)
>>
>> And jfyi, the drivers/video/ changes will conflict with the
>> drivers/video/ directory reorganizat
Hi,
On 23/01/14 16:14, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last ones and
> as
> this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again.
>
> Some comments up-front:
>
> - @Ingo: Patch #1 and #2 are unchanged from the previous ML discussi
Hi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On 03/03/14 12:29, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>>> What's the status with this one? Headed for 3.15?
>>>
>>> Are the SimpleDRM and sysfb linked somehow? (I.e. do they need to be in
>>> the same series?)
>>>
>>> And jfyi, the drivers/video/
Hi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/01/14 16:14, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last ones
>> and as
>> this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again.
>>
>> Some comments up-front:
>>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:18:51PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last ones
> > and as
> > this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again.
> >
> >
Hi
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last ones and
> as
> this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again.
>
> Some comments up-front:
>
> - @Ingo: Patch #1 and #2 are unchanged from the previous
Hi
Another round of SimpleDRM patches. I somehow lost track of the last ones and as
this is a major rewrite, I'll just start at v1 again.
Some comments up-front:
- @Ingo: Patch #1 and #2 are unchanged from the previous ML discussions. I
included them in this series as the other patches depen
13 matches
Mail list logo
