On 08/28/2013 03:15 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
>> commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
>> 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
>> due to inve
On 08/28/2013 03:15 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
due to inverted lock orde
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley
wrote:
> This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
> commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
> 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
> due to inverted lock order between nouveau_drm_vblank_enable(
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
> commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
> 'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
> due to inverted lock order between nouveau_drm_vblank_enable()
This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
due to inverted lock order between nouveau_drm_vblank_enable()
and nouveau_drm_vblank_handler() (the complete
lockdep report
This series was originally motivated by a deadlock, introduced in
commit 1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b
'drm/nouveau/disp: port vblank handling to event interface',
due to inverted lock order between nouveau_drm_vblank_enable()
and nouveau_drm_vblank_handler() (the complete
lockdep report