On 28.02.2019 23:13, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Alexandre.
>
These patches adds support for SAM9X60's LCD controller.
>>> Can you elaborate a little more which chips that are relevant.
>>> To be able to look into the right data-sheet, while reviewing.
>>> Link to data-sheet would be nice
On 28/02/2019 19:21:19+0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Claudiu
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:24:11PM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Claudiu Beznea
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > These patches adds support for SAM9X60's LCD controller.
> Can you elaborate a little more which chips tha
Hi Alexandre.
> > >
> > > These patches adds support for SAM9X60's LCD controller.
> > Can you elaborate a little more which chips that are relevant.
> > To be able to look into the right data-sheet, while reviewing.
> > Link to data-sheet would be nice too.
> >
>
> sam9x60 is the chip name (i.
Hi Claudiu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:24:11PM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea
>
> Hi,
>
> These patches adds support for SAM9X60's LCD controller.
Can you elaborate a little more which chips that are relevant.
To be able to look into the right data-sheet, while
From: Claudiu Beznea
Hi,
These patches adds support for SAM9X60's LCD controller.
First patches add option to specify if controller clock source is fixed.
Second patch avoid a variable initialization in
atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb().
The 3rd one adds specific bindings for SAM9X60 LCD contro
