Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

Hi Andrzej, On Monday, 18 December 2017 10:43:51 EET Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 15.12.2017 16:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> - The connector is apparently not the right ab

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

Hi Daniel, On Friday, 15 December 2017 17:54:15 EET Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> - The connector is apparently not the right abstraction to carry > >> the detailed timings sp

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

On 15.12.2017 16:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Linus Walleij >> wrote: >> >>> - The connector is apparently not the right abstraction to carry >>> the detailed timings specification between DRI drive

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > > > - The connector is apparently not the right abstraction to carry > > the detailed timings specification between DRI drivers and bridge > > drivers. > > > > - Instead

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > - The connector is apparently not the right abstraction to carry > the detailed timings specification between DRI drivers and bridge > drivers. > > - Instead put detailed timing data into the bridge itself as an > optional information

[PATCH 0/4 v5] Support bridge timings

This patch set is in response to Laurent's mail: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg155618.html So in summary: - The connector is apparently not the right abstraction to carry the detailed timings specification between DRI drivers and bridge drivers. - Instead put detailed timing data