Hi,
On 8 December 2014 at 17:03, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2014-12-06 Dave Airlie :
> > On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan
> wrote:
> > > Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that
> sits on
> > > top of this one. Thanks.
> >
> > Inki, any plans on when you
Hi Inki,
2014-12-06 Dave Airlie :
> On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > Hi Inki,
> >
> > Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits
> > on
> > top of this one. Thanks.
>
> Inki, any plans on when you can get to looking at this?
>
> I think
On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Inki,
>
> Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits on
> top of this one. Thanks.
Inki, any plans on when you can get to looking at this?
I think cleaning up exynos so we can get atomic using it is somethi
Hi Inki,
Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits on
top of this one. Thanks.
Gustavo
2014-11-24 Gustavo Padovan :
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Hi Inki,
>
>
From: Gustavo Padovan
Hi Inki,
In this series I've removed some level of indirection from the exynos_drm_code.
There two moves in these patches, first we remove all exynos_drm_crtc_plane_*()
wrappers and call the manager s