On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:49 +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was really pleased to see that the damage helper had landed. Now I
> can
> do framebuffer flushing solely through the display pipe functions.
> This
> prepares the ground for the removal of struct tinydrm_device in my
> next
> se
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:50 PM Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was really pleased to see that the damage helper had landed. Now I can
> do framebuffer flushing solely through the display pipe functions. This
> prepares the ground for the removal of struct tinydrm_device in my next
> series.
A
Den 09.01.2019 19.26, skrev Sam Ravnborg:
> Hi Noralf.
>
>>
>> I was really pleased to see that the damage helper had landed. Now I can
>> do framebuffer flushing solely through the display pipe functions. This
>> prepares the ground for the removal of struct tinydrm_device in my next
>> series.
Hi Noralf.
>
> I was really pleased to see that the damage helper had landed. Now I can
> do framebuffer flushing solely through the display pipe functions. This
> prepares the ground for the removal of struct tinydrm_device in my next
> series.
I browsed through the code - and the code paths I
Hi,
I was really pleased to see that the damage helper had landed. Now I can
do framebuffer flushing solely through the display pipe functions. This
prepares the ground for the removal of struct tinydrm_device in my next
series.
Note:
The damage helper isn't in drm-misc-next yet, it will show up
