On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:52:34AM +, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > > A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to
> > > change the drm_connector and drm_encoder fields to pointer in the
> > > drm_connector_writeback structure, this received a huge pushback from
Hi Daniel,
> > A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to
> > change the drm_connector and drm_encoder fields to pointer in the
> > drm_connector_writeback structure, this received a huge pushback from
> > the community but since i915 expects each connector present in the
>
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:12:16AM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to change
> the drm_connector and drm_encoder fields to pointer in the
> drm_connector_writeback structure, this received a huge pushback from
> the community but since i9
A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to change
the drm_connector and drm_encoder fields to pointer in the
drm_connector_writeback structure, this received a huge pushback from
the community but since i915 expects each connector present in the
drm_device list to be a intel_
