[PATCH 0/3] drm: more pre-decrement fixes

2016-02-16 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Christian König wrote: > Am 15.02.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Rasmus Villemoes: >> >> A few more cases where one should use post-decrement when unwinding, >> this time found where the unwinding is done inside the setup loop >> instead of after an error label. > > > Patc

[PATCH 0/3] drm: more pre-decrement fixes

2016-02-16 Thread Christian König
Am 15.02.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Rasmus Villemoes: > A few more cases where one should use post-decrement when unwinding, > this time found where the unwinding is done inside the setup loop > instead of after an error label. Patch 1 and 3 are Reviewed-by: Christian König . Nice catch, Christian.

[PATCH 0/3] drm: more pre-decrement fixes

2016-02-15 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
A few more cases where one should use post-decrement when unwinding, this time found where the unwinding is done inside the setup loop instead of after an error label. Rasmus Villemoes (3): drm/amdgpu: use post-decrement in error handling drm/nouveau: use post-decrement in error handling drm