Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2022-08-19 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 08:16:07AM +, Simon Ser wrote: > (It seems like the list was dropped in my reply, sorry about that. > Re-adding it now.) > > On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at 14:06, Michał Winiarski > wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:39:13AM +, Simon Ser wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2022-08-19 Thread Simon Ser
(It seems like the list was dropped in my reply, sorry about that. Re-adding it now.) On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at 14:06, Michał Winiarski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:39:13AM +, Simon Ser wrote: > > > Hm, I'm a bit worried about the user-space implications of this… e.g. libdrm

[PATCH 0/3] drm: Use full allocated minor range for DRM

2022-08-17 Thread Michał Winiarski
64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. Upgrade it to 512K (which definitely is more than enough). Additionally - one minor tweak around minor IDR locking. Michał Winiarski (3): drm: Don't reserve minors for control nodes drm: Expand max DRM device number to full MINORBITS drm: Use m