> "df622729ddbf drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity" had to
> be reverted due to it introducing a use after free. I guess this
> patchset now conflicts with the revert.
>
I do get some build fail message on other branch. Do I need to revert this
patchset on drm-misc-next or left to bran
Am Sonntag, dem 02.04.2023 um 18:22 +0800 schrieb Qiang Yu:
> Applied to drm-misc-next.
>
"df622729ddbf drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity" had to
be reverted due to it introducing a use after free. I guess this
patchset now conflicts with the revert.
Regards,
Lucas
> On Mon, Mar 13
Applied to drm-misc-next.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:09 AM Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> Patch set is:
> Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
>
> Looks like drm-misc-next does not contain "df622729ddbf drm/scheduler:
> track GPU active time per entity" yet.
> Will apply later.
>
> Regards,
> Qiang
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 20
Patch set is:
Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
Looks like drm-misc-next does not contain "df622729ddbf drm/scheduler:
track GPU active time per entity" yet.
Will apply later.
Regards,
Qiang
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 7:31 AM Erico Nunes wrote:
>
> Expose lima gp and pp usage stats through fdinfo, following
Expose lima gp and pp usage stats through fdinfo, following
Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst.
Borrowed from these previous implementations:
"df622729ddbf drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity" added
usage time accounting to drm scheduler, which is where the data used
here comes from
