Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-03-02 Thread John Harrison
On 3/2/2022 03:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 28/02/2022 19:17, John Harrison wrote: On 2/28/2022 07:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 19:03, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 10:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-03-02 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 28/02/2022 19:17, John Harrison wrote: On 2/28/2022 07:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 19:03, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 10:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-28 Thread John Harrison
On 2/28/2022 07:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 19:03, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 10:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-28 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 25/02/2022 19:03, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 10:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread John Harrison
On 2/25/2022 10:29, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 25/02/2022 18:01, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread John Harrison
On 2/25/2022 09:39, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 25/02/2022 17:11, John Harrison wrote: On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread John Harrison
On 2/25/2022 08:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Comput

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-25 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 24/02/2022 20:02, John Harrison wrote: On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptib

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-24 Thread John Harrison
On 2/23/2022 04:00, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible on current hardware. Thus the pre-emption

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-23 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 23/02/2022 02:22, John Harrison wrote: On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible on current hardware. Thus the pre-emption timeout was disabled as a workaround to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-22 Thread John Harrison
On 2/22/2022 01:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible on current hardware. Thus the pre-emption timeout was disabled as a workaround to prevent unwanted resets. Instead, the hang det

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-22 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 18/02/2022 21:33, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible on current hardware. Thus the pre-emption timeout was disabled as a workaround to prevent unwanted resets. Instead, the hang detection was left to the heartbeat and its

[PATCH 0/3] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads

2022-02-18 Thread John . C . Harrison
From: John Harrison Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible on current hardware. Thus the pre-emption timeout was disabled as a workaround to prevent unwanted resets. Instead, the hang detection was left to the heartbeat and its (longer) timeout. This is undesirable with GuC submission