Resend: [PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-05-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:14 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Ping! > Ack! Should have been in 2.6.34. Dave.

Resend: [PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-05-27 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Ping! On 04/28/2010 11:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > The first patch removes some leftover debug messages in the ttm_lock code > so far only used by the vmwgfx driver. > > The second patch removes the ttm_bo_block_reservation() function, since > it is buggy. A bo shouldn't be reserved while rem

Re: Resend: [PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-05-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:14 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Ping! > Ack! Should have been in 2.6.34. Dave. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Resend: [PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-05-27 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Ping! On 04/28/2010 11:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: The first patch removes some leftover debug messages in the ttm_lock code so far only used by the vmwgfx driver. The second patch removes the ttm_bo_block_reservation() function, since it is buggy. A bo shouldn't be reserved while remaining

[PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-04-28 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
The first patch removes some leftover debug messages in the ttm_lock code so far only used by the vmwgfx driver. The second patch removes the ttm_bo_block_reservation() function, since it is buggy. A bo shouldn't be reserved while remaining on lru lists.

[PATCH 0/2] drm/ttm: A couple of small fixes

2010-04-28 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
The first patch removes some leftover debug messages in the ttm_lock code so far only used by the vmwgfx driver. The second patch removes the ttm_bo_block_reservation() function, since it is buggy. A bo shouldn't be reserved while remaining on lru lists. __