[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:40:56PM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > > On 03/03/2016 02:33 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > >> > >> On 03/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Fabien D

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On 03/03/2016 02:33 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: >> >> On 03/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: Hi Ville, Using DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD/DRM_

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > > > On 03/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > >> Hi Ville, > >> > >> Using DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD/DRM_MODE_PRESENT_BOTTOM_FIELD assumes > >> that the

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On 03/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: >> Hi Ville, >> >> Using DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD/DRM_MODE_PRESENT_BOTTOM_FIELD assumes >> that the userland controls the field presentation on the display output. >> This assumes t

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > Hi Ville, > > Using DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD/DRM_MODE_PRESENT_BOTTOM_FIELD assumes > that the userland controls the field presentation on the display output. > This assumes that the userland is aware of the field actually on dis

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

Hi Ville, Using DRM_MODE_PRESENT_TOP_FIELD/DRM_MODE_PRESENT_BOTTOM_FIELD assumes that the userland controls the field presentation on the display output. This assumes that the userland is aware of the field actually on display and I think that this information is not provided by the DRM framewor

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:26:03AM +0100, Vincent Abriou wrote: > Interlaced video can have different scan order: > Top Field First or Bottom Field First > > In case of video with interlaced content, this information should be > propagated from the userland to the DRM kernel driver that will proce

[PATCH 0/2] drm/sti: support of interlaced content with Bottom Field

Interlaced video can have different scan order: Top Field First or Bottom Field First In case of video with interlaced content, this information should be propagated from the userland to the DRM kernel driver that will process the deinterlacing starting with the top or the bottom field first. That