[PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST

2015-12-15 Thread Wentland, Harry
Awesome. Thanks, Daniel. Harry From: Daniel Vetter on behalf of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 12:32 PM To: Wentland, Harry Cc: Alex Deucher; Maling list - DRI developers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST On Mon, Dec 14

[PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST

2015-12-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
; > Thanks, > Harry > > > From: Alex Deucher > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:26 AM > To: Wentland, Harry > Cc: Maling list - DRI developers > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Harry Wentland

[PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST

2015-12-14 Thread Wentland, Harry
Thanks, Alex. Dave, will you pick these up when pulling from Alex's tree if he includes them? Thanks, Harry From: Alex Deucher Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:26 AM To: Wentland, Harry Cc: Maling list - DRI developers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2

[PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST

2015-12-14 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Harry Wentland wrote: > Two minor patches for MST here. We were replying NACK to UP requests > when we intended to ACK them. We were also not filling in the vcpi > field for mst_mgr->payloads although it's defined. Saving the vcpi > simplifies the new amdgpu MST im

[PATCH 0/2] Two small patches for MST

2015-12-07 Thread Harry Wentland
Two minor patches for MST here. We were replying NACK to UP requests when we intended to ACK them. We were also not filling in the vcpi field for mst_mgr->payloads although it's defined. Saving the vcpi simplifies the new amdgpu MST implementation that we currently work on. Harry Wentland (1): d