On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote:
>> > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure
>> > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but
>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote:
> > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure
> > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but
> > I'm sending it just in case.
>
> I'm not o
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote:
> I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure
> whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but
> I'm sending it just in case.
I'm not opposed to fixing existing issues like this, but really I think
there shou
Hi,
I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure
whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but
I'm sending it just in case.
Thanks,
Javi
Javi Merino (2):
drm: use .hword to represent 16-bit numbers
drm: Add O= support
Documentation/EDID/Make