Re: [PATCH 0/2] Documentation/EDID fixes

2017-03-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote: >> > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure >> > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Documentation/EDID fixes

2017-03-07 Thread Javi Merino
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote: > > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure > > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but > > I'm sending it just in case. > > I'm not o

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Documentation/EDID fixes

2017-03-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino wrote: > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but > I'm sending it just in case. I'm not opposed to fixing existing issues like this, but really I think there shou

[PATCH 0/2] Documentation/EDID fixes

2017-03-06 Thread Javi Merino
Hi, I found these two minor issues while building an EDID. I'm not sure whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but I'm sending it just in case. Thanks, Javi Javi Merino (2): drm: use .hword to represent 16-bit numbers drm: Add O= support Documentation/EDID/Make