Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] Fix gem_ctx_persistence failures with GuC submission

2021-08-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:08:02PM -0700, John Harrison wrote: > On 8/9/2021 23:38, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:33:59PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > Should fix below failures with GuC submission for the following tests: > > > gem_exec_balancer --r noheartbeat > > > gem_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] Fix gem_ctx_persistence failures with GuC submission

2021-08-17 Thread John Harrison
On 8/9/2021 23:38, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:33:59PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: Should fix below failures with GuC submission for the following tests: gem_exec_balancer --r noheartbeat gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-close Not going to fix: gem_ctx_persistence --r heart

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix gem_ctx_persistence failures with GuC submission

2021-08-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:33:59PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > Should fix below failures with GuC submission for the following tests: > gem_exec_balancer --r noheartbeat > gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-close > > Not going to fix: > gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-many > gem_ctx_persistence

[PATCH 0/1] Fix gem_ctx_persistence failures with GuC submission

2021-07-28 Thread Matthew Brost
Should fix below failures with GuC submission for the following tests: gem_exec_balancer --r noheartbeat gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-close Not going to fix: gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-many gem_ctx_persistence --r heartbeat-stop As the above tests change the heartbeat value to 0 (off)