Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-08-09 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 11:20 +0100, Dennis Tsiang wrote: > On 30/06/2022 08:47, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:53:49 + > > Simon Ser wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 at 16:46, Dennis Tsiang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for your comments. This is not inten

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-07-16 Thread Dennis Tsiang
On 30/06/2022 08:47, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:53:49 + Simon Ser wrote: On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 at 16:46, Dennis Tsiang wrote: Thanks for your comments. This is not intended to be used for KMS, where indeed there would be no difference. This proposal is for oth

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-06-30 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:53:49 + Simon Ser wrote: > On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 at 16:46, Dennis Tsiang > wrote: > > > Thanks for your comments. This is not intended to be used for KMS, where > > indeed there would be no difference. This proposal is for other Graphics > > APIs such as Vulk

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-06-29 Thread Simon Ser
On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 at 16:46, Dennis Tsiang wrote: > Thanks for your comments. This is not intended to be used for KMS, where > indeed there would be no difference. This proposal is for other Graphics > APIs such as Vulkan, which requires the application to be explicit > upfront about

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-06-29 Thread Dennis Tsiang
On 27/06/2022 15:50, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:40:04 + Dennis Tsiang wrote: This patch is an early RFC to discuss the viable options and alternatives for inclusion of unsigned integer formats for the DRM API. This patch adds a new single component 16-bit and a two compo

[PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-06-27 Thread Dennis Tsiang
This patch is an early RFC to discuss the viable options and alternatives for inclusion of unsigned integer formats for the DRM API. This patch adds a new single component 16-bit and a two component 32-bit DRM fourcc’s that represent unsigned integer formats. The use case for needing UINT formats,

Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] drm/fourcc: Add new unsigned R16_UINT/RG1616_UINT formats

2022-06-27 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:40:04 + Dennis Tsiang wrote: > This patch is an early RFC to discuss the viable options and > alternatives for inclusion of unsigned integer formats for the DRM API. > > This patch adds a new single component 16-bit and a two component 32-bit > DRM fourcc’s that repres