On 11/17/2010 08:11 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>
>> The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
>> on top of the latest TTM patches.
>>
>> Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
> on top of the latest TTM patches.
>
> Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit of using
> shared code. Will also ease implementation of c
The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
on top of the latest TTM patches.
Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit of using
shared code. Will also ease implementation of concurrent CS due to the
deadlock prevention mechanisms.
If time all
On 11/17/2010 08:11 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
on top of the latest TTM patches.
Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit of using
share
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
> on top of the latest TTM patches.
>
> Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit of using
> shared code. Will also ease implementation of co
The patch is compile-tested ony and not very intrusive. It should be applied
on top of the latest TTM patches.
Besides reduced CPU-usage on SMP kernels, there is the benefit of using
shared code. Will also ease implementation of concurrent CS due to the
deadlock prevention mechanisms.
If time all
