On 4/13/23 21:33, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
When dev_err_probe() is called, 'ret' holds the value of the previous
successful devm_request_irq() call.
'ret' should be assigned with a meaningful value before being used in
dev_err_probe().
While at it, use and return "PTR_ERR(ctrl->clk)" instead of
Le 19/04/2023 à 06:59, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:09:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
When dev_err_probe() is called, 'ret' holds the value of the previous
successful devm_request_irq() call.
'ret' shoul
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:09:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > When dev_err_probe() is called, 'ret' holds the value of the previous
> > successful devm_request_irq() call.
> > 'ret' should be assigned with a meaningful value
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> When dev_err_probe() is called, 'ret' holds the value of the previous
> successful devm_request_irq() call.
> 'ret' should be assigned with a meaningful value before being used in
> dev_err_probe().
>
> While at it, use and retu
When dev_err_probe() is called, 'ret' holds the value of the previous
successful devm_request_irq() call.
'ret' should be assigned with a meaningful value before being used in
dev_err_probe().
While at it, use and return "PTR_ERR(ctrl->clk)" instead of a hard-coded
"-ENOENT" so that -EPROBE_DEFER
