On 30/01/2021 10:45, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
>
> Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2021年1月10日 週日 上午6:59寫道:
>>
>> Hi, Matthias:
>>
>> Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年12月3日 週四 上午7:59寫道:
>>>
>>> rx_callback is a standard mailbox callback mechanism and could
>>> cover the function of proprietary cmdq_task_cb, so
Hi, Matthias:
Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2021年1月10日 週日 上午6:59寫道:
>
> Hi, Matthias:
>
> Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年12月3日 週四 上午7:59寫道:
> >
> > rx_callback is a standard mailbox callback mechanism and could
> > cover the function of proprietary cmdq_task_cb, so it is better
> > to use the standard one instead of th
Hi, Matthias:
Chun-Kuang Hu 於 2020年12月3日 週四 上午7:59寫道:
>
> rx_callback is a standard mailbox callback mechanism and could
> cover the function of proprietary cmdq_task_cb, so it is better
> to use the standard one instead of the proprietary one. But
> register rx_callback should before mbox_reques
rx_callback is a standard mailbox callback mechanism and could
cover the function of proprietary cmdq_task_cb, so it is better
to use the standard one instead of the proprietary one. But
register rx_callback should before mbox_request_channel(),
so remove cmdq_pkt_flush() and let client driver impl