Hey,
Op 14-01-15 om 03:16 schreef Zhou, Jammy:
>>> I think it would be best to leave timeout=0 returning 0. Not handling it
>>> differently gives the same semantics as used by fence_wait_time and
>>> wait_event_timeout.
>>> Are there really many cases in which you don't know if timeout = 0 befor
] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)
Hey,
Op 14-01-15 om 03:16 schreef Zhou, Jammy:
>>> I think it would be best to leave timeout=0 returning 0. Not handling it
>>> differently gives the same semantics as used by fence_wait_time and
>>> wait_e
>> I think it would be best to leave timeout=0 returning 0. Not handling it
>> differently gives the same semantics as used by fence_wait_time and
>> wait_event_timeout.
>> Are there really many cases in which you don't know if timeout = 0 before or
>> not?
>Yeah I think with this it's more imp
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:18:19AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 13-01-15 om 10:22 schreef Christian König:
> > Am 13.01.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> >> Op 13-01-15 om 10:36 schreef Jammy Zhou:
> >>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
> >>> is
When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the
Op 13-01-15 om 10:22 schreef Christian König:
> Am 13.01.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> Op 13-01-15 om 10:36 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>>
>>> Return
Am 13.01.2015 um 10:04 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Op 13-01-15 om 10:36 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>
>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout
Op 13-01-15 om 10:36 schreef Jammy Zhou:
> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>
> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero t
ou, Jammy; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)
Op 13-01-15 om 10:36 schreef Jammy Zhou:
> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
> is zero, no wait
